|
Supreme
Court pulls up Gillani
Mani Devaj
Long after he is swept from power people
will remember President Zardari as the worst thing that happened to
Pakistan, his administration
will forever be marked in history as the most corrupt, the most inept,
the most uncaring and the one that destroyed Pakistan's infrastructure
and plunged Pakistan into the dark ages with blackouts closing
factories.
Having experienced the arrogance and
vagaries of military dictatorships; Pakistanis tolerated this
democratically elected government while praying for a constitutional end
to its chicanery. The Supreme Court's decision of January 10 by Justice
Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, is an answer to these prayers.
It is a thoughtful, well written
decision, worthy of the best decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of
any land. Justice Khosa reaches back to the sage Aristotle: "When laws
do not rule, there is no Constitution".
The court starts with a finding that the
National Accountability Bureau failed to proceed against criminals
appointed to posts by the Government "despite clear directions issued...
by. (the) court" and finds the conduct "... to be utterly
unsatisfactory... an attempt ... to screen, shield and protect"
criminals. This conduct showed a ".contemptuous disregard of... " the
Courts and reflected an attitude "... we find to be contumacious, to say
the least."
Justice Khosa points out that in the
Mobashir case the Court had issued clear and specific directions to the
Federal Government but in the two years that had elapsed since that
decision, the Government had delayed implementation under "one pretext
or the other". While the Court "demonstrated a lot of patience and
restraint" and provided ample opportunity to implement the court order,
it appeared that the Government "consciously decided to defy and disobey
this Court." This left the court with "... no other option but to, as
warned in categorical terms on the last date of hearing, take
appropriate actions in order to uphold and maintain the dignity of this
Court and to salvage and restore the delicately poised constitutional
balance in accord with the norms of constitutional democracy."
Justice Khosa declares that the Prime
Minister of Pakistan and the President of Pakistan have failed to abide
by their oath of office as prescribed in the Constitution of Pakistan.
It was clear to the court that the Prime
Minister and the President made "a political decision not to obey some
part of the judgment handed down by this Court" and that their "loyalty
to a political party" outweighs their loyalty to the State and their
"inviolable obligation" to obey the Constitution and all its commands.
"We may unhesitatingly observe that in our country governed by a
Constitution political loyalty cannot be accepted as stronger than
loyalty to the State and dictates of a political master or party cannot
be allowed to be put up as a defence to failure to obey the
Constitution."
While the decision lays out the
rationale that the Court, comprising of five Justices, expects to use to
render its ultimate judgment, it has forwarded options to the Chief
Justice of Pakistan, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudry, and asked that the
final decision be rendered by the full bench of the Supreme Court,
comprising of 15 Justices. The Options are:
1. In accordance with clause (f) of
Article 62(1) of the Constitution, the Court may find that the Prime
Minister was not qualified to be a member of Parliament because he is
not "sagacious, righteous, non-profligate, honest and amen". The court
could make a finding in view of the "apparent persistent, obstinate and
contumacious resistance, failure or refusal of the Chief Executive of
the Federation to completely obey, carry out or execute the directions
issued by this Court ... that he may not be an "honest" person on
account of his not being honest to the oath of his office and seemingly
he may not be an "ameen" due to his persistent betrayal of the trust
reposed in him as a person".
2. Initiate proceedings against the
Chief Executive, the Federal Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights
Division and the Federal Secretary Law, Justice and Human Rights
Division for committing contempt of Court for "persistently, obstinately
and contumaciously resisting, failing or refusing to implement or
execute in full the directions issued by this Court in its judgment".
3. Appoint a Commission to execute the
relevant parts of the judgment passed and directions issued in the case
of Dr. Mobashir Hassan.
4. Proceed against the Chairman,
National Accountability Bureau for failure to follow the Court's
directions.
5. If it appears that the Government
will defy the Court than, to avoid a direct confrontation that may
destroy the country, let the people decide what should be done.
In three and half short years the
economic engine that was Pakistan has come to a grinding halt as Zardari
and his cohorts declared open season on Pakistan and looted its wealth.
While corruption is nothing new in Pakistan and in most developing
countries, corruption that paralyses an entire nation (and prevents
economic development at a time when countries in similar situation are
becoming the envy of the world) has the same effect as the hordes of
Chengez Khan and his Mongol successors that ravaged and plundered the
world killing, by some estimates, 40 million people.
For Zardari, what anyone may think has
never mattered. He has shown his mastery of the art of politicking by
cajoling, conniving, committing and coming up with creative solutions
that have kept him in power and made mere bystanders of the seasoned
career politicians of Pakistan. Zardari has a keen sense of
understanding as to what he needs to do to get his way and how far he
can push his agenda. In fact it may not be too far off the mark to say
that he actually relishes and enjoys the rush of being at the precipice
in dealing with opponents and issues.
If Zardari was indeed looking for
another rush, then the Supreme Court findings and decision handed down
on Tuesday provide him with a volcanic eruption of adrenalin. It is now
up to the full bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan to ensure that it
does not step back from the decision rendered Tuesday so that the rule
of law may finally prevail in Pakistan.
It is said that every cloud has a silver
lining. For Pakistan, Zardari's disregard for law and the Courts has
provided an opportunity for Pakistan's Court to build a Supreme
Monument to the Supremacy of Law and Justice. While Zardari will be remembered
for heading Pakistan's worst government, it
may also be said that but for Zardari's unscrupulousness, Pakistan may
never have received the gift of a Supreme
Monument. |