|
Highs and lows of PF-1 by-poll
Over-concerned parents looked at
the government notification and wondered at the wisdom behind
the announcement on April 11 of a local holiday meaning thereby
the closure of all educational institutions in and around city.
With suppressed giggles the
flippant students, on the other hand, felt overjoyed at the idea
of having an extended weekend.
Teachers, however, thought that
the new academic year was to start anyway from April 15 and the
random closure of schools for a day did not greatly matter.
The compulsions of education
department were all too evident as by-election to the NWFP
Assembly seat from constituency PF-1 was scheduled for April 11.
Most of the 65 polling stations
had been set up in local schools of the constituency.
The polling staff mostly
comprised male and female schoolteachers. The transportation of
the ballot papers, indelible ink and stamps had to be done on
the same day.
Rehearsal of the polling staff
hired by the election commission was also supposed to be carried
out.
So the announcement of local
holiday was fairly predictable at least for precocious children.
The well-contested by-election
was won by Haji Aurangzeb Khan with a lead of 8,500 votes over
his rival candidate.
Haji Aurangzeb obtained the
maximum of 12,500 out of a total of 1,23,275 votes in his
constituency.
He was supported jointly by
Awami National Party, Pakistan People's Party,
Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-i-Azam group) and Pakistan
People's Party (Sherpao group).
In all about 13 contestants,
including a female candidate, were in the electoral fray.
The second highest number of
votes (4,000) was grabbed by the Jamaat-i-Islami's familiar
candidate Haji Dost Muhammad.
The JI candidate was given a
tough time not only by ANP's Aurangzeb but also by Dr Zakir Shah
of Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) and to some extent by
Jamiat-i-Ulema-i-Islam-Fazlur Rehman group's Akhunzada
Irfanullah Shah, whose supporters had plastered the available
space on walls with huge colourful posters of their candidate.
Originally a total of 17
candidates had filed election papers but four of them later
withdrew their candidature and in a way bowed out of the
contest.
The contestants who were in the
electoral fray as independent candidates but remained in low key
included Aitebar Khan Yousafzai, Akram Khan, Anwar Gul,
Behrullah, Muhammad Shahzeb, Mir Alam Khan and the woman
candidate Ghaliba Khurshid.
At one stage on Saturday, the
trigger-happy election workers resorted to gun firing near a
polling station meant for female voters on Dalazak Road.
This led to panic and the voters
scampered for life under the glare of television cameras.
The victory of Haji Aurangzeb
Khan in the PF-1 by-poll was a foregone conclusion.
The sympathy vote was sure to
come as the seat had fallen vacant after Aurangzeb's brother
Alamzeb Khan MPA was killed in an explosion on Dalazak Road.
After inspecting the development
work in his constituency he had hardly climbed back into his car
when an improvised explosive device went off with a loud bang.
Aurangzeb was unanimously
supported by four political parties which could each
conveniently field a rival candidate against him.
After the unfortunate incident
of gun firing on Saturday, when viewers saw people stampeding on
Dalazak Road, the over-concerned parents momentarily heaved a
sigh of relief at the thought that due to the public holiday
their children were safe and sound within the four walls of the
home otherwise the individuals stampeding on Dalazak Road could
well have been their unwary children.
As stated above, the total
number of registered voters in the constituency stood at
1,23,275 out of which 75,615 were in the category of male and
47,660 as female voters. About 34 of the polling stations were
set up for male and 31 for female voters.
For by-poll, which lasted from
8am to 5pm, the election commission had engaged 65 presiding,
218 assistant presiding and an equal number of polling officers.
The election symbols are
randomly allotted to contestants but they often carry an
emotional connotation in the whole process.
Majority of the people is
interested only in knowing as to who has emerged as the overall
winner.
However, a tiny minority also
likes to remember trivial things like the electoral symbols.
Some readers, for instance, may like to know that, victory or
defeat, Haji Aurangzeb was allotted the symbol of a lantern,
Haji Dost Muhammad that of a clock, Irfanullah Shah a book, Dr
Zakir Shah a lion, Aitebar Khan a crown, Anwar Gul an inkpot,
Akram Khan a bull-cart, Behrullah a suitcase, Ghaliba Khurshid a
house, Muhammad Shahzeb a letter-box and Mir Alam Khan was
allotted the symbol of a football.
The independent election
observers noted that the votes of religious parties -
Jamaat-i-Islami and Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (Fazlur Rehman group) -
got divided this time as Haji Dost Muhammad and Irfanullah Shah
were pitted against one another.
They carried out a lively and
passionate election campaign and thus gave each other a tough
time.
The independent candidates by
and large fared ill.
The democratic process has
created political awareness among the voters and they seem to
know that independent candidates are not bound by any kind of
party discipline or a personal code of ethics.
Whenever post-election alliances
are cobbled together, more often than not the independent
candidates are carried away by political expediency, opportunism
and magnetic pull of material gains.
As against the independent
candidates, those attached to established political parties are
guided and motivated by lofty ideals and moral principles.
In recent history, the emerging
forward blocs in various parties indicate that even political
loyalties and moral principles do not strictly bind the elected
representatives to any universally acknowledged code of ethics.
The elected representatives tend
to get swayed by the slightest of temptations thrown in their
way in terms of money and material.
Commitment to a great cause,
devotion to a lofty ideal or fascination with a political
ideology seems to be things of the distant past. |